![]() ![]() ![]() Nobody is arguing against what you said, the only statement that I am referring to is the one that a team can not win a Cup without high scoring forwards. Once again you are not understanding the question at hand. We do know that we have a great group of young defenders and it is very possible that one or more take the reins and run with it. As I pointed out earlier you can not dismiss good young dmen as not being able to take the next step to Norris consideration because dmen are difficult to project. ![]() The thing that is more common among Cup winners is a great D-corps with a true #1 dman much more so than having a "superstar" high scoring forward. If our defence develops well we could very well be in the same situation that Carolina is in right now in as soon as 3 years but likely closer to 5 years. Do most teams have them, yes but 5 of the last 13 cups were won by teams without a top 10 scorer or a ppg forward aka no "superstar" forwards. The only point of the discussion is whether you need superstar forwards to win a cup and the correct answer is no. Once again there is no point in bringing up teams that have had "superstars" in this debate as it is irrelevant. We do know that we have a great group of young defenders and it is very possible that one or more take the reigns and run with it. Do Cup winners have them, yes but 5 of the last 13 cups were won by teams without a top 10 scorer or a ppg forward aka no "superstar" forwards. The term is meaningless anyways and is just a lazy offering in any meaningful debate as the term does not have clear parameters and does not have a common colloquial meaning. The term is entirely subjective as the many conflicting debates on these boards about what constitutes a superstar over the years would attest to. I bolded the exact reason why the term "superstar" is subjective as you had to preface your statement with "I'd call". we could be surprised how good the team will be. once they'll be young veterans, when they get it. f*** yeah.Īdd Dach, Slaf, RHP, Heineman, Beck, Roy and the young D studs at maturity with solid goaling from Monty + not-Primeau. ![]() With Suz and CC as our 2 best fw? Yeah, if they become the Bergeron-Marchand type of line, for years? Yeah. It's a long game and 3 years from now we could be a solid competitor in the top 10. The decisions up to now are indicative of a proper strategy applied succesfully (how much is tbd) in a fluid context with legacy constraint holding you back. All of them were stars before their new position. It is the formative years from GM to Head Coach to Players. The development seems better than previous years and.now they have something to work with. The Perry, Toes, Monahan are sharing their tricks when on plays with them.īeing coached by great players like MSL also help the guys actually figuring it out faster and add a color, dimensions to their play. Experience is a thing, Game-smart is another. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |